Free logo fonts for commercial use
- #Free logo fonts for commercial use trial#
- #Free logo fonts for commercial use license#
- #Free logo fonts for commercial use download#
"Free" status is never assumed, unless the author has designated the font as such.
#Free logo fonts for commercial use license#
For older fonts, submitted by someone other than the author, where a verified read me doc with license terms is either absent or non existent, the license terms field is left blank. It is true that all fonts marked as 100% Free on DaFont have been so designated by the author, at the time of submission, or a subsequent change of license terms. If LEEMINSUN had just used the more vague term 'Free', your supplemental information would be relevant to this question, and to other questions similar to this one. My answer is 100% true, with reference to his specific request. In my interpretation, Free and 100% Free are not the LEEMINSUN did specify 100% Free, and put it in quotes. And, I believe, that is what the original poster is trying to avoid. If I were the graphic artist I wouldn't put at risk a client because he did not get the proper permission. What could likely happen is if the author is a kid who took offense at his font being used commercially without his approval and starts a smear campaign on social media against the client. Although the chance of a lawsuit is negligible, it still exists. We are putting at risk here the integrity of the graphic artist or the welfare of his/her client. The only person whose interpretation matters is that of the font author and it might be contrary to what was brought forward here. There is no guarantee that the font author will accept whatever is said here. We can talk endlessly about our differing interpretation of the term but will the author accept that.
If the font was uploaded here before as Free and was subsequently changed by the site admin to 100% Free without the knowledge of the font author what is its implication? To me the term "100% Free" is synonymous to public domain. In my interpretation, Free and 100% Free are not the same. One problem with this is that this is a very new terminology on this site.
#Free logo fonts for commercial use trial#
Something like that would never get to the trial stage. She wouldn't win the case, even with inept defense counsel. You owe me $1,000 for the overnight date". In the morning, she says "By the way, I'm a prostitute. I don't think, in contracts, a fee for performance can be determined after the fact.Įxample: A man meets a woman at a night club.
#Free logo fonts for commercial use download#
The file creation date from the download might be the crucial evidence. Someone who downloaded the font between January 1-31 could argue that it is 100% free for them, but free for personal use, for anyone who downloaded February 1 or later. That could make for an interesting court debate: Author uploads the font on January 1, as 100% Free, and makes the font Free for personal use on February 1.
Sometimes someone here will upload a 100% free font, and then change the terms, if the font is popular. If It's free, except when someone wants it for commercial use, then it's free for personal use. Many authors make their fonts 100% free, to avoid inquiries like this. If the license terms are clear, there's no need to ask if free means free. I disagree, A font with a 100% Free status was designated as such, by the author.